Israel- Palestine War: from Past to Present
The U.S. has a deep strategic, military, and political alliance with Israel. It provides billions of dollars in annual military aid, advanced defense technology like the Iron Dome system, and strong diplomatic support at international platforms such as the UN Security Council, often vetoing resolutions critical of Israel.
Moreover, the sociopolitical influence of the Jewish community in the U.S. is notable — the country has one of the largest Jewish populations in the world, even larger than that of Israel itself. This has contributed to strong domestic support for pro-Israel policies, influencing both public opinion and political stances in Washington.
During the Trump administration, this alignment became more pronounced. President Donald Trump openly recognized Jerusalem as the capital of Israel in 2017, moving the U.S. Embassy there — a move celebrated in Israel but condemned globally and by Palestinians, who view East Jerusalem as their future capital.
As a result, settlement construction surged during that period, deepening mistrust and further destabilizing the peace process.
While the Biden administration has attempted to restore some balance by supporting humanitarian aid to Gaza and advocating a two-state solution, Palestinians remain skeptical. They continue to view the U.S. as a partial mediator, more concerned with maintaining its geopolitical influence in the Middle East than ensuring an equitable resolution.
![]() |
| Image Credit: Kobi Gideon/Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Palestinians Demands
- Israel’s withdrawal from pre- 1967 borders and establishment of an independent Palestine state in West Bank and Gaza: Palestinians demand that Israel withdraw to the boundaries that existed before the 1967 Six-Day War — when Israel captured the West Bank, Gaza Strip, and East Jerusalem. These territories are seen as the rightful lands of a future Palestinian state.
The demand is rooted in the UN Resolution 242 (1967), which called for Israel’s withdrawal from occupied territories in exchange for peace and recognition. Palestinians believe that only by returning to the pre-1967 borders can they achieve true sovereignty, territorial integrity, and a viable state of their own — free from Israeli control.
- Halt to Israeli settlements before peace talks resume: Palestinians insist that peace talks cannot be meaningful while Israel keeps expanding these settlements. They view a complete freeze on settlement construction as a minimum condition for restarting negotiations, ensuring that future borders are not decided unilaterally on the ground.
- The right of return for refugees displaced in 1948: During the 1948 Arab–Israeli War, an estimated 700,000 Palestinians were expelled or fled from their homes in what became Israel. These refugees and their descendants — now numbering over 5 million — live in refugee camps across Lebanon, Syria, Jordan, and the occupied territories.
The “Right of Return” is one of the most emotional and symbolic Palestinian demands, as it represents justice and restoration for those who lost their homes and land. Palestinians base this claim on UN Resolution 194, which recognizes refugees’ right to return or receive compensation.
However, Israel fears that granting this right would undermine its demographic majority, and thus firmly opposes it.
- East Jerusalem as capital of independent Palestine state: For Palestinians, East Jerusalem is not just a city — it’s a symbol of their national identity and spiritual heritage. Home to the Al-Aqsa Mosque, the third holiest site in Islam, East Jerusalem holds immense religious and cultural importance.
Palestinians envision East Jerusalem as the capital of their future independent state, while Israel claims the entire city as its “undivided capital."
- Sovereignty over Jerusalem : Jerusalem holds immense religious and historical importance for Jews, Muslims, and Christians alike. For Israel, claiming full sovereignty over Jerusalem—especially East Jerusalem—is seen as essential to its national identity.
Israel considers the entire city its “eternal and indivisible capital,” after capturing East Jerusalem during the 1967 Six-Day War. However, Palestinians view East Jerusalem as the capital of their future independent state.
This dispute remains one of the most contentious issues in peace negotiations, as both sides attach deep spiritual and cultural significance to the city. Any compromise here is seen domestically by both parties as a test of political strength and national pride.
- Recognition of Israel as a Jewish state: Israel demands that Palestine and the broader international community formally recognize it as a Jewish state. This recognition, according to Israel, is crucial to ensure the legitimacy and security of its identity as a homeland for the Jewish people.
However, Palestinians fear that such recognition could marginalize the Arab population living inside Israel and weaken the demand for the right of return for Palestinian refugees.
This issue has become symbolic of the wider struggle — Israel sees recognition as a guarantee of its existence, while Palestinians see it as a potential erasure of their historical and cultural presence.
- Right of return of Palestine refugees only to Palestine, not Israel: Palestinians demand the right of return — the ability for these refugees and their descendants to return to their ancestral homes. Israel, however, firmly opposes this demand. It argues that allowing millions of Palestinian refugees to settle inside Israel would drastically alter its demographic balance, effectively ending its Jewish character. Instead, Israel proposes that refugees should return to the future Palestinian state (once established) or receive financial compensation. This stance remains one of the biggest roadblocks in achieving a two-state solution, as the refugee question is deeply emotional and tied to generations of displacement and loss.
![]() |
| Image credit: Jaber Jehad Badwan/ Wikimedia Commons/CC BY-SA 4.0 |
The international community has expressed deep concern over the escalating humanitarian crisis in Gaza. Several nations and global institutions have begun calling out Israel’s actions as violations of international law. The United Nations has repeatedly condemned the use of disproportionate force and urged for an immediate ceasefire to allow humanitarian aid to reach civilians trapped in conflict zones.
- Two-State Solution: The most widely supported proposal globally is the Two-State Solution, which envisions an independent State of Palestine coexisting peacefully alongside the State of Israel.
This would mean establishing Palestine in Gaza and most of the West Bank, while Israel retains the remaining territories.
- Joint- Capital in Jerusalem: Since both the parties want Jerusalem in their territory, the city can act as a mutual capital. This could involve dividing administrative control — allowing West Jerusalem to serve as Israel’s capital and East Jerusalem as Palestine’s, or establishing a special international governance system for the city.
Such an arrangement would not only protect the religious sanctity of the city but also respect the cultural and spiritual attachments of both communities.
- Financial Inclusion: Global funding and humanitarian assistance to Palestine to strengthen its economy and improve the standard of living. The international community must focus on financial inclusion and global funding for Palestine.
By investing in education, healthcare, infrastructure, and job creation, Palestine’s standard of living can significantly improve. Economic empowerment will reduce dependency on foreign aid and foster self-sufficiency and resilience among Palestinians.
Organizations like the World Bank, IMF, and UN agencies can play key roles in ensuring transparent and targeted assistance to rebuild war-torn areas such as Gaza.
- Border Realignments: modifying boundaries based on the current scenario . Both sides could agree on land swaps — where Israel retains some major settlement blocs near its border, while Palestine receives equivalent land elsewhere.
- Refugee Repatriation: tackling the issue of Palestinian refugees return with potential compensation.

.jpg)

Comments
Post a Comment